"Result of bad deeds" by Musafir 2013/04/30 05:59
Father of America who insulted Prophet Mohammad s.a.w and Quran died with high electric shock, you can download this image and see properly result of his bad deed :)
i hope this topic will not change in war, i hope all users do respect of others ?
Father of America who insulted Prophet Mohammad s.a.w and Quran died with high electric shock, you can download this image and see properly result of his bad deed :)
i hope this topic will not change in war, i hope all users do respect of others ?
missu 2013/06/13 17:11
We condemn any bad act of any moulvi anywhere,anytime with anyone we do not make lame excuses like u using word fake ch.
We condemn any bad act of any moulvi anywhere,anytime with anyone we do not make lame excuses like u using word fake ch.
missu 2013/06/13 17:18
IT is time for my rest and i will continue debate next time after june i will b offline becoz my school will reopen
IT is time for my rest and i will continue debate next time after june i will b offline becoz my school will reopen
Musafir 2013/06/13 19:28
That's your own statement. There is a
claim that the army is tormenting
muslims. It might be true. BTW you
just used the words muslims of
kashmir. Does this complete your
challenge where you asked me to show you where you used the word
muslims?
[b]My challenge was to show "Muslims of kashmir becoming terrorist for
revenge" not only muslims :-P [/b]
Then why would you even bring up
the kashmir example when we were
talking about terrorism? It was your
own admission of guilt. Except you
called it "revenge". I call it terrorism.
[b] I brought this matter to prove you
that who are real terrorists, Muslims
or MAN IN WHITE COAT [/b]
The challenge is complete. The fact that
you brought up "muslims of kashmir"
when i was talking about terrorism
proves you were talking about islamic
terrorists. Avoiding to use the word only
proves your cowardice in this matter.
[b] The challenge will only complete
when you will prove the blame which you put on me, that i agreed that muslims of kashmir became terrorist for revenge, you cant prove it till last day of your death [/b]
Winning a debate requires both parties to be honest. If one refuses
to admit they are wrong even when
shown the errors in their logic, then how can you defeat them? At least me and missu are still talking more or less respectfully, unlike you in your "debates". I still remember how all your "debates" in Faith/Beliefs would end with you asking your opponent where he lives and threatening to hurt him. Is
that how you win a debate? Pathetic.
Now you are changing the topic come on ! I will not hurt you, i just want you to show me where is mentioned "KASHMIRI PEOPLES BECOMING TERRORIST FOR REVENGE"
I still don't know how kashmir example was
relevant if you weren't trying to make
the claim that muslims become terrorists
for revenge.
[b] I just gave an example on which you claimed muslims as
terrorist, now prove or give up. . :-P And forget about faith belief, this is nice way to run away from challenge. [/b]
and thanks for accepting my victory in faithzone.
That's your own statement. There is a
claim that the army is tormenting
muslims. It might be true. BTW you
just used the words muslims of
kashmir. Does this complete your
challenge where you asked me to show you where you used the word
muslims?
[b]My challenge was to show "Muslims of kashmir becoming terrorist for
revenge" not only muslims :-P [/b]
Then why would you even bring up
the kashmir example when we were
talking about terrorism? It was your
own admission of guilt. Except you
called it "revenge". I call it terrorism.
[b] I brought this matter to prove you
that who are real terrorists, Muslims
or MAN IN WHITE COAT [/b]
The challenge is complete. The fact that
you brought up "muslims of kashmir"
when i was talking about terrorism
proves you were talking about islamic
terrorists. Avoiding to use the word only
proves your cowardice in this matter.
[b] The challenge will only complete
when you will prove the blame which you put on me, that i agreed that muslims of kashmir became terrorist for revenge, you cant prove it till last day of your death [/b]
Winning a debate requires both parties to be honest. If one refuses
to admit they are wrong even when
shown the errors in their logic, then how can you defeat them? At least me and missu are still talking more or less respectfully, unlike you in your "debates". I still remember how all your "debates" in Faith/Beliefs would end with you asking your opponent where he lives and threatening to hurt him. Is
that how you win a debate? Pathetic.
Now you are changing the topic come on ! I will not hurt you, i just want you to show me where is mentioned "KASHMIRI PEOPLES BECOMING TERRORIST FOR REVENGE"
I still don't know how kashmir example was
relevant if you weren't trying to make
the claim that muslims become terrorists
for revenge.
[b] I just gave an example on which you claimed muslims as
terrorist, now prove or give up. . :-P And forget about faith belief, this is nice way to run away from challenge. [/b]
and thanks for accepting my victory in faithzone.
missu 2013/06/14 03:09
dr outlaw i never said that we should pat back of ourselves i say if u have said in your very first post that pastor's
dr outlaw i never said that we should pat back of ourselves i say if u have said in your very first post that pastor's
missu 2013/06/14 03:18
Dr outlaw u could not prove challenge of musafir and mine most of time u gave up u r working/thinking on your prepared/
Dr outlaw u could not prove challenge of musafir and mine most of time u gave up u r working/thinking on your prepared/
missu 2013/06/14 03:21
media prepared thinking that muslims r terrorists then how can u accept this truth that islam and terroris is opposite
media prepared thinking that muslims r terrorists then how can u accept this truth that islam and terroris is opposite
Musafir 2013/06/14 05:41
infact, He himself proved that Indian Army is real terrorist for innocent peoples, I agree that terrorists are killing innocent peoples but no where i said that those terrorists are muslims he claimed or you can say blamed me, that i agreed muslims as terrorist, which was false blame by outlaw, now until he will not prove it i will not move my debate ahead.
You too remember this theory, no one will take interest in reading your 454 posts, win your debate in 4 to 5 posts.
Quote: missu: Dr outlaw u could not prove challenge of musafir and mine most of time u gave up u r working/thinking on your prepared/
He will not be able to prove muslims as terrorists infact, He himself proved that Indian Army is real terrorist for innocent peoples, I agree that terrorists are killing innocent peoples but no where i said that those terrorists are muslims he claimed or you can say blamed me, that i agreed muslims as terrorist, which was false blame by outlaw, now until he will not prove it i will not move my debate ahead.
You too remember this theory, no one will take interest in reading your 454 posts, win your debate in 4 to 5 posts.
Musafir 2013/06/14 06:11
brOtha ! before teaching others see in yourself and your argument. Is it related to topics very first post ?
Quote: outlaw: But if you didn't mean that, than kashmir issue is totally unrelated to our argument. That's the same thing i have been trying to tell missu. Don't bring up unrelated arguments, unless you want to use them to make a point.
If its so, why we are arguing on terrorists ? My topic was not related on terrorists, then why you are pressured on proving muslims as terrorist brOtha ! before teaching others see in yourself and your argument. Is it related to topics very first post ?
Musafir 2013/06/14 06:37
Ok I can't prove that you said "muslim terrorists are terrorists only because they are seeking revenge against non-muslims". YOu never said that verbatim. You win the challenge. *pats you on the back* well done! You just won an internet argument! Isn't that awesome?
[b]At last you accepted your lost hahaha thats it ! And over for arguments.
It proved nonsense and just popping useless posts, and dont take tension for your question i an going to answer ahead [/b]
Now can you tell me why you brought up the kashmir example when i said that terrorism is bad even when it is done in the name of revenge?
Its my issue to bring any matter in debate, it still does'nt proves KASHMIRI MUSLIMS AS TERRORISTS FOR REVENGE. I brought this matter to prove you that real terrorists are MAN IN WHITE COAT and not those who comes in eye, Those are innocent peoples who are hurted by those to whom we salute.
It's more important that instead of focusing on who said what, we focus on who means what.
This is like leaving arrow in dark, every clever will focus on who said what
And i thought you were saying that because muslims are being tormented in kashmir,
I am not responsible for what you think or whats your thinking
it is okay for other non-kashmiri muslims to kill other non-kashmiri non-muslims. If you didn't say that, accept my apologies.
hahahahaha bro now you are getting nerves and desperate -hahaha- show me where i said this ? That mom muslims are killing muslims and i will give up.
Quote: outlaw: Ok I can't prove that you said "muslim terrorists are terrorists only because they are seeking revenge against non-muslims". YOu never said that verbatim. You win the challenge. *pats you on the back* well done! You just won an internet argument! Isn't that awesome?
Now can you tell me why you brought up the kashmir example when i said that terrorism is bad even when it is done in the name of revenge? It's more important that instead of focusing on who said what, we focus on who means what. And i thought you were saying that because muslims are being tormented in kashmir, it is okay for other non-kashmiri muslims to kill other non-kashmiri non-muslims. If you didn't say that, accept my apologies.
Now can you tell me why you brought up the kashmir example when i said that terrorism is bad even when it is done in the name of revenge? It's more important that instead of focusing on who said what, we focus on who means what. And i thought you were saying that because muslims are being tormented in kashmir, it is okay for other non-kashmiri muslims to kill other non-kashmiri non-muslims. If you didn't say that, accept my apologies.
Ok I can't prove that you said "muslim terrorists are terrorists only because they are seeking revenge against non-muslims". YOu never said that verbatim. You win the challenge. *pats you on the back* well done! You just won an internet argument! Isn't that awesome?
[b]At last you accepted your lost hahaha
thats it ! And over for arguments.
It proved nonsense and just popping useless posts, and dont take tension for your question i an going to answer ahead
[/b]
Now can you tell me why you brought up the kashmir example when i said that terrorism is bad even when it is done in the name of revenge?
Its my issue to bring any matter in debate, it still does'nt proves KASHMIRI MUSLIMS AS TERRORISTS FOR REVENGE. I brought this matter to prove you that real terrorists are MAN IN WHITE COAT and not those who comes in eye, Those are innocent peoples who are hurted by those to whom we salute.
It's more important that instead of focusing on who said what, we focus on who means what.
This is like leaving arrow in dark, every clever will focus on who said what
And i thought you were saying that because muslims are being tormented in kashmir,
I am not responsible for what you think or whats your thinking
it is okay for other non-kashmiri muslims to kill other non-kashmiri non-muslims. If you didn't say that, accept my apologies.
hahahahaha bro now you are getting nerves and desperate -hahaha- show me where i said this ? That mom muslims are killing muslims and i will give up.
missu 2013/06/14 06:58
musafir he has given up 2 or more times u can read my post and see it yourself he has been caught many times in his net
musafir he has given up 2 or more times u can read my post and see it yourself he has been caught many times in his net
Musafir 2013/06/14 09:05
Quote: Musafir:
Ok I can't prove that you said "muslim terrorists are terrorists only because they are seeking revenge against non-muslims". YOu never said that verbatim. You win the challenge. *pats you on the back* well done! You just won an internet argument! Isn't that awesome?
[b]At last you accepted your lost hahaha thats it ! And over for arguments.
It proved nonsense and just popping useless posts, and dont take tension for your question i an going to answer ahead [/b]
Now can you tell me why you brought up the kashmir example when i said that terrorism is bad even when it is done in the name of revenge?
Its my issue to bring any matter in debate, it still does'nt proves KASHMIRI MUSLIMS AS TERRORISTS FOR REVENGE. I brought this matter to prove you that real terrorists are MAN IN WHITE COAT and not those who comes in eye, Those are innocent peoples who are hurted by those to whom we salute.
It's more important that instead of focusing on who said what, we focus on who means what.
This is like leaving arrow in dark, every clever will focus on who said what
And i thought you were saying that because muslims are being tormented in kashmir,
I am not responsible for what you think or whats your thinking
it is okay for other non-kashmiri muslims to kill other non-kashmiri non-muslims. If you didn't say that, accept my apologies.
hahahahaha bro now you are getting nerves and desperate -hahaha- show me where i said this ? That mom muslims are killing muslims and i will give up.
In last phrase i mean non kashmiri muslims killing non kashmiri non muslim.
Ok I can't prove that you said "muslim terrorists are terrorists only because they are seeking revenge against non-muslims". YOu never said that verbatim. You win the challenge. *pats you on the back* well done! You just won an internet argument! Isn't that awesome?
[b]At last you accepted your lost hahaha
thats it ! And over for arguments.
It proved nonsense and just popping useless posts, and dont take tension for your question i an going to answer ahead
[/b]
Now can you tell me why you brought up the kashmir example when i said that terrorism is bad even when it is done in the name of revenge?
Its my issue to bring any matter in debate, it still does'nt proves KASHMIRI MUSLIMS AS TERRORISTS FOR REVENGE. I brought this matter to prove you that real terrorists are MAN IN WHITE COAT and not those who comes in eye, Those are innocent peoples who are hurted by those to whom we salute.
It's more important that instead of focusing on who said what, we focus on who means what.
This is like leaving arrow in dark, every clever will focus on who said what
And i thought you were saying that because muslims are being tormented in kashmir,
I am not responsible for what you think or whats your thinking
it is okay for other non-kashmiri muslims to kill other non-kashmiri non-muslims. If you didn't say that, accept my apologies.
hahahahaha bro now you are getting nerves and desperate -hahaha- show me where i said this ? That mom muslims are killing muslims and i will give up.
missu 2013/06/14 13:54
Dr u have accepted that pastor's act is condemable and this is related to subject of the topic
Dr u have accepted that pastor's act is condemable and this is related to subject of the topic
missu 2013/06/14 13:58
Dr outlaw i will continue debate after namaz the subject is not muslims r terrorist or not u b honest first
Dr outlaw i will continue debate after namaz the subject is not muslims r terrorist or not u b honest first
missu 2013/06/14 14:02
Dr outlaw why r u babbling so much how can other country's army come there?do not babble yar
Dr outlaw why r u babbling so much how can other country's army come there?do not babble yar
Replies: 571
This topic is closed.
#74 Trash Zone
A junkyard for threads to be deleted later.