"Result of bad deeds" by Musafir 2013/04/30 05:59
Father of America who insulted Prophet Mohammad s.a.w and Quran died with high electric shock, you can download this image and see properly result of his bad deed :)
i hope this topic will not change in war, i hope all users do respect of others ?
Father of America who insulted Prophet Mohammad s.a.w and Quran died with high electric shock, you can download this image and see properly result of his bad deed :)
i hope this topic will not change in war, i hope all users do respect of others ?
missu 2013/06/13 15:55
i never claim about mughals civilized behaviour in my any post it were u who claimed the so called people r civilized
i never claim about mughals civilized behaviour in my any post it were u who claimed the so called people r civilized
missu 2013/06/13 16:04
dr u should learn how to read i know those who laid down their lives were civilized who deny this fact i pointed towards
dr u should learn how to read i know those who laid down their lives were civilized who deny this fact i pointed towards
missu 2013/06/13 16:08
in which post i used word most people i used word so called which means तथाकथित
in which post i used word most people i used word so called which means तथाकथित
missu 2013/06/13 16:12
Then keep aside the question some muslims r uncivilised or not come to the topic related question whether pastor's act
Then keep aside the question some muslims r uncivilised or not come to the topic related question whether pastor's act
missu 2013/06/13 16:16
Read your first post in this topic u did not condemn the act of pastor inspite of condemning what do u want to say read
Read your first post in this topic u did not condemn the act of pastor inspite of condemning what do u want to say read
missu 2013/06/13 16:20
If u r honest and civilized then u should condemn the act of pastor in your very first post but u did not do so then
If u r honest and civilized then u should condemn the act of pastor in your very first post but u did not do so then
missu 2013/06/13 16:23
Then my answer is no religious man of any religion is bad if he/she is religious.
Then my answer is no religious man of any religion is bad if he/she is religious.
missu 2013/06/13 16:37
This is the folly of yours if i say a moulvi is not a true muslim then it is very surprising so do not b fool yourself
This is the folly of yours if i say a moulvi is not a true muslim then it is very surprising so do not b fool yourself
missu 2013/06/13 16:40
if this pastor is not christian then will u please tell me is a non christian made a pastor in any church
if this pastor is not christian then will u please tell me is a non christian made a pastor in any church
missu 2013/06/13 16:44
yeah in which my post i said religious persons r bad i said post of christians r anti islamic this pastor is a christian
yeah in which my post i said religious persons r bad i said post of christians r anti islamic this pastor is a christian
missu 2013/06/13 16:48
again i say no religious man ...so u should say this pastor does not deserve the sacred post of pastor if he is alive
again i say no religious man ...so u should say this pastor does not deserve the sacred post of pastor if he is alive
Musafir 2013/06/13 16:49
Dude, it's obvious you are talking about
muslims when you talk about the
"people of kashmir" who are
supposedly being tormented by the
Indian army.
DO YOU AGREE THAT INDIAN ARMY IS TORMENTING MUSLIMS OF KASHMIR ???
Your above quote itself proves that you are agree on this
you yourself proved Indian Army fuckin predator.
Who else constitutes the
majority population of Kashmir? The jews?
IT STILL DOES'NT PROVES THAT THOSE MUSLIMS WHO ARE TORMENTED BY INDIAN ARMY ARE THOSE TERRORISTS ?
Now all you are doing is using the same
dishonest tactic of defending these
"people of kashmir" and their "revenge"
I NO WHERE MENTIONED THAT TERRORISTS ARE MUSLIMS OF KASHMIR ?? INFACT I GAVE YOU CHALLENGE WHICH YOU FAILED TO PROVE.
terrorism, but at the same time avoiding
any association with them by saying that
they are not true muslims. If you think the kashmiris' cause is so noble, then
why are you still scared to use the word
muslim to describe them? Because deep
down you know they are terrorists? Because you feel every muslims is part of
a cohesive family, a "brother", and
instead of admitting that some
"brothers" of this "family" are terrorists,
you want to redefine the family to
exclude those brothers. Nice try, but you don't think the world sees right through
this?
I DONT HAVE MORE ENERGY NOR I AM FREE KINDA LIKE YOU TO ARGUE MORE, I CAN ARGUE BUT ONLY WHEN YOU WILL COMPETE MY CHALLENGE AND PROVE ME, WHERE I DESCRIBED MUSLIMS OF KASHMIR BECOMING TERRORIST ?
If you cant, argue with missu,he is missing you alot -hahaha- Genuine debator will finish his debate in minutes with victory.
If you are failed proving that I mentioned
"Muslims becoming terrorist for revenge"
you will be only BOLBACHAN
Remember, topic up to date.
Dude, it's obvious you are talking about
muslims when you talk about the
"people of kashmir" who are
supposedly being tormented by the
Indian army.
DO YOU AGREE THAT INDIAN ARMY IS TORMENTING MUSLIMS OF KASHMIR ???
Your above quote itself proves that you are agree on this
you yourself proved Indian Army fuckin predator.
Who else constitutes the
majority population of Kashmir? The jews?
IT STILL DOES'NT PROVES THAT THOSE MUSLIMS WHO ARE TORMENTED BY INDIAN ARMY ARE THOSE TERRORISTS ?
Now all you are doing is using the same
dishonest tactic of defending these
"people of kashmir" and their "revenge"
I NO WHERE MENTIONED THAT TERRORISTS ARE MUSLIMS OF KASHMIR ?? INFACT I GAVE YOU CHALLENGE WHICH YOU FAILED TO PROVE.
terrorism, but at the same time avoiding
any association with them by saying that
they are not true muslims. If you think the kashmiris' cause is so noble, then
why are you still scared to use the word
muslim to describe them? Because deep
down you know they are terrorists? Because you feel every muslims is part of
a cohesive family, a "brother", and
instead of admitting that some
"brothers" of this "family" are terrorists,
you want to redefine the family to
exclude those brothers. Nice try, but you don't think the world sees right through
this?
I DONT HAVE MORE ENERGY NOR I AM FREE KINDA LIKE YOU TO ARGUE MORE, I CAN ARGUE BUT ONLY WHEN YOU WILL COMPETE MY CHALLENGE AND PROVE ME, WHERE I DESCRIBED MUSLIMS OF KASHMIR BECOMING TERRORIST ?
If you cant, argue with missu,he is missing you alot -hahaha- Genuine debator will finish his debate in minutes with victory.
If you are failed proving that I mentioned
"Muslims becoming terrorist for revenge"
you will be only BOLBACHAN
Remember, topic up to date.
Musafir 2013/06/13 16:50
muslims when you talk about the
"people of kashmir" who are
supposedly being tormented by the
Indian army.
DO YOU AGREE THAT INDIAN ARMY IS TORMENTING MUSLIMS OF KASHMIR ???
Your above quote itself proves that you are agree on this you yourself proved Indian Army fuckin predator.
Who else constitutes the
majority population of Kashmir? The jews?
IT STILL DOES'NT PROVES THAT THOSE MUSLIMS WHO ARE TORMENTED BY INDIAN ARMY ARE THOSE TERRORISTS ?
Now all you are doing is using the same
dishonest tactic of defending these
"people of kashmir" and their "revenge"
I NO WHERE MENTIONED THAT TERRORISTS ARE MUSLIMS OF KASHMIR ?? INFACT I GAVE YOU CHALLENGE WHICH YOU FAILED TO PROVE.
terrorism, but at the same time avoiding
any association with them by saying that
they are not true muslims. If you think the kashmiris' cause is so noble, then
why are you still scared to use the word
muslim to describe them? Because deep
down you know they are terrorists? Because you feel every muslims is part of
a cohesive family, a "brother", and
instead of admitting that some
"brothers" of this "family" are terrorists,
you want to redefine the family to
exclude those brothers. Nice try, but you don't think the world sees right through
this?
I DONT HAVE MORE ENERGY NOR I AM FREE KINDA LIKE YOU TO ARGUE MORE, I CAN ARGUE BUT ONLY WHEN YOU WILL COMPETE MY CHALLENGE AND PROVE ME, WHERE I DESCRIBED MUSLIMS OF KASHMIR BECOMING TERRORIST ?
If you cant, argue with missu,he is missing you alot -hahaha- Genuine debator will finish his debate in minutes with victory.
If you are failed proving that I mentioned
"Muslims becoming terrorist for revenge"
you will be only BOLBACHAN
Quote: outlaw:
Dude, it's obvious you are talking about muslims when you talk about the "people of kashmir" who are supposedly being tormented by the Indian army. Who else constitutes the majority population of Kashmir? The jews?
Now all you are doing is using the same dishonest tactic of defending these "people of kashmir" and their "revenge" terrorism, but at the same time avoiding any association with them by saying that they are not true muslims. If you think the kashmiris' cause is so noble, then why are you still scared to use the word muslim to describe them? Because deep down you know they are terrorists?
Because you feel every muslims is part of a cohesive family, a "brother", and instead of admitting that some "brothers" of this "family" are terrorists, you want to redefine the family to exclude those brothers. Nice try, but you don't think the world sees right through this?
Dude, it's obvious you are talking about
Dude, it's obvious you are talking about muslims when you talk about the "people of kashmir" who are supposedly being tormented by the Indian army. Who else constitutes the majority population of Kashmir? The jews?
Now all you are doing is using the same dishonest tactic of defending these "people of kashmir" and their "revenge" terrorism, but at the same time avoiding any association with them by saying that they are not true muslims. If you think the kashmiris' cause is so noble, then why are you still scared to use the word muslim to describe them? Because deep down you know they are terrorists?
Because you feel every muslims is part of a cohesive family, a "brother", and instead of admitting that some "brothers" of this "family" are terrorists, you want to redefine the family to exclude those brothers. Nice try, but you don't think the world sees right through this?
muslims when you talk about the
"people of kashmir" who are
supposedly being tormented by the
Indian army.
DO YOU AGREE THAT INDIAN ARMY IS TORMENTING MUSLIMS OF KASHMIR ???
Your above quote itself proves that you are agree on this
you yourself proved Indian Army fuckin predator.
Who else constitutes the
majority population of Kashmir? The jews?
IT STILL DOES'NT PROVES THAT THOSE MUSLIMS WHO ARE TORMENTED BY INDIAN ARMY ARE THOSE TERRORISTS ?
Now all you are doing is using the same
dishonest tactic of defending these
"people of kashmir" and their "revenge"
I NO WHERE MENTIONED THAT TERRORISTS ARE MUSLIMS OF KASHMIR ?? INFACT I GAVE YOU CHALLENGE WHICH YOU FAILED TO PROVE.
terrorism, but at the same time avoiding
any association with them by saying that
they are not true muslims. If you think the kashmiris' cause is so noble, then
why are you still scared to use the word
muslim to describe them? Because deep
down you know they are terrorists? Because you feel every muslims is part of
a cohesive family, a "brother", and
instead of admitting that some
"brothers" of this "family" are terrorists,
you want to redefine the family to
exclude those brothers. Nice try, but you don't think the world sees right through
this?
I DONT HAVE MORE ENERGY NOR I AM FREE KINDA LIKE YOU TO ARGUE MORE, I CAN ARGUE BUT ONLY WHEN YOU WILL COMPETE MY CHALLENGE AND PROVE ME, WHERE I DESCRIBED MUSLIMS OF KASHMIR BECOMING TERRORIST ?
If you cant, argue with missu,he is missing you alot -hahaha- Genuine debator will finish his debate in minutes with victory.
If you are failed proving that I mentioned
"Muslims becoming terrorist for revenge"
you will be only BOLBACHAN
missu 2013/06/13 16:52
think again should u not say this pastor does not deserve this post if such act had been done by a moulvi we would have
think again should u not say this pastor does not deserve this post if such act had been done by a moulvi we would have
Replies: 571
This topic is closed.
#74 Trash Zone
A junkyard for threads to be deleted later.