All other relationships for sex to get couple with, except what The Allmighty God has shown are not good at all. TheGod has declared them HARAAM (unlawful).

I agree with you saahir it's Unlawful in all religions

It makes it sound like sex is like food, like its a 3 times a day thing that you cant live without. Its Unlawful.

sex is human instinct and its related between male&female so any types of artificial way to having sex is unlawful.

Its good

This is NOT real sex. How can u get satisfaction ? Its all in the mind.

Disgusting

I don't judge anyone but I believe whoever would use dolls for satisfaction has some serious issues. I mean , what you've mentioned to prevent cheating in relationship imagine how one would feel when they hear the partner cheated them on with a doll.What would be excuse for that?

Two words for him "Mentally Retard"

Well...... ^o^ who can resist Hatsune [xlimg=http://2wapworld.com/xgslidex142406.jpg] Only *1,599 165cm, real silicone

Thanks for ur thought & remark

Lols I guess u finding the topic very disguisting and this is what many across the globe embraces

Its just ridiculous, mind sickness, nothing more than that. ....

I’m sure it means neither harm nor good as such. If some people make use of it in the sense that it is useful to them, no harm done. They are aware that a silicon doll doesn’t replace a human being. In some countries in Africa and Asia real women are as disposable as a rubber doll, and that’s something we should worry about, not about sex dolls.

While I agree with most of what you say, I hardly think any country, let alone countries limited to two continents have a monopoly on the mistreatment or abuse of women. But I digress ... On topic: C'est la vie, people will always do as they wish when it comes to sexuality, censor them and they'll only do it more discretely, so I don't see much point provided its safe, sane and consensual I think the individual adult should be allowed to decide for themselves without undue interference. My sole concern is the height and apparent age of certain dolls, I feel this is something that can and should be regulated. I may be indifferent to the use of adult dolls by those who wish to, but there are also child-like and child dolls and that I am far from okay with.

I'd hardly call it natural and certainly not a sexual orientation. The fight for recognition, equal rights and treatment for the LGBT community has been (and continues to be)long and hard fought, as I see it pedophiles merely wish to ride those coattails and normalize their proclivities by drawing comparisons where there are none. The idea that pedophilia is in someway an orientation stems in large part from a mistype in a printed discussion in the DSM-5 released by the American Psychiatric Association (hence forth referred to as the APA). The APA thereafter released a statement correcting the mistake saying, " 'Sexual orientation' is not a term used in the diagnostic criteria for pedophilic disorder and its use in the DSM-5 text discussion is an error and should read 'sexual interest.' In fact, APA considers pedophilic disorder a 'paraphilia,' not a 'sexual orientation.' This error will be corrected in the electronic version of DSM-5 and the next printing of the manual." As such, feeding these abnormal urges in any way, increases the chance of child abuse, it does not decrease them.

Well,i can say that a sex doll is'nt for me but i don't judge other people for using them.

hy

Forgotten ... As for whether heterosexuality is innate or not, well everyone has their own opinions on that, no way to prove it one way or the other. Technically pedophilia can only be diagnosed from 19 years old and above. Its there before but from a medical point of view it can only be diagnosed from 19 years and older. There are those who do not act, some even seek help volunteer to be chemically castrated. While I wouldn't go so far as to say I sympathize, I do think they are a step above those who would act on said urge. That is supposedly what separates us from animals after all, the ability to act against or in spite of our instincts.

Which I would agree with save for the "abnormal" bit that comes before urges. Normal means many things to many people but pedophilia is outside the realms of what is normal for most of society across cultural, religious and national boundries. Comparing it to what is normal is like comparing apples and oranges, they're both edible fruits but beyond that point comparisons only serve to highlight just how different they are. Abnormal urges are compulsive, you wouldn't advocate a cocaine addict cutting and snorting sherbet as part of his rehabilitation would you? No, because the most effective way to stop is to break from anything that contributes to that habit and feeds said compulsive urge. Fantasies are just that, fantasies. They have little basis in reality. People may flirt with the idea of non-consensual themes in play but as with all things, reality and fantasy are worlds apart and they would not argue otherwise. Which is why they incorporate those themes into play but do not for instance place themselves in a situation where they can actually be raped or rape someone.