In January, an analysis of census data showed that nearly 10% of the babies and toddlers in England and Wales are Muslim. The percentage of Muslims among children under five is almost twice as high as in the general population. By way of comparison, fewer than one in 200 people over the age of 85 are Muslim, an indication of the extent to which the birth rate is changing the religious demographic in Britain. Also in January, Muslim fundamentalists threatened to behead a fellow British Muslim after he posted an innocuous image of Mohammed and Jesus on his Twitter account. The death threats against Maajid Nawaz, a Liberal Democrat Party candidate for British Parliament, added to the growing number of cases in which Islamists are using intimidation tactics to restrict the free speech rights of fellow Muslims in Europe. On January 16, a Muslim woman was arrested by counter-terrorism police at Heathrow Airport as she was preparing to board a flight to Turkey. Nawal Masaad, 26, is accused of trying to smuggle £16,500 (*27,000; €20,000) in her underwear to jihadists in Syria. She and her alleged co-conspirator, Amal El-Wahabi, 27—a Moroccan who does not work and claims British social welfare benefits for herself and two young sons—were the first British women to be charged with terrorism offenses linked to the conflict in Syria.

I think that we should be very careful in general, more especially in the UK, how we structure and word discourse on any sensitive subject. In order to narrow the debate to the actual issues and not allow it to degenerate into the all too common accusation and name slinging we so often see. For instance any other difference is usually treated more tactfully. For instance, if the gang is comprised mainly of people of a particular race we would not focus on it. The same for the economic class or orientation, why then would we focus on their religion and even more specifically their religion only if their religion is Islam. We do not speak of Christian gangs or Aethiest gangs or Bhuddist gangs so why then speak of Muslim gangs.

No "gangs" has anything to do with this topic, it's about global Islamic terrorism which can only be nourished by the people who read and follow quran. I think you should get the central theme now. The news has nothing to do with street thugs.

"3) the sexual exploitation of British children by Muslim gangs" There, "gangs" this is clear. What is not clear however is how this is a topic about so called "Islamic terrorism". The topic title is "Islamization of Britain", is this not what is being debated? Or is the "theme" and topic title unrelated.

deport these filthy people

Try to if you want your neighbour to blow himself taking you with him. They're breeding like rats and humans cant stop them.

Humans cant stop the teenage pregnancy issue in the UK either. 48 000 babies were born to girls between 15 and 19 years of age in Britain alone last year. children breeding? considering that Britain has one of the highest percentage of contraceptive users in the world, its a bit hectic. the non muslim population between 15 and 19 is clearly breeding ( out of stupidity) at a more alarming rate than the parents of the 10% muslim population.... Wait.... England having a problem with being colonized by someone? Ironic. Now now the muslims kill 250 000 of British women and children in concentration camps.... Pfffftt!

Here they come with their suicide wastes