Oh. Its kinda bad and so sad to do such a thing on an animal. Remember the animal has feelings and a life also

In m0st cases, animals are treated with great care.

I love animals and am against animal testing but if researchers don't use animals to test the products then what else will they use? Human beings?

No. I'm so against this. Sometimes I don't understand y human can b called creature with highest intelligence if their existence is to hurt other creatures. It makes me sick

that is exactly my questi0n, if animals are n0t used in laboratories, what are the alternatives?

Ya...Wat a pity for th0se animals.Why n0t just l0ok for other alternatives aside fr0m using animals?

animals are n0t en0ugh like humans to give useful results.

. I totally agree wid you on this.

In certain research fields (e.g. regarding cancer or HIV research) some animal testing sadly can't be avoided. Also, I suppose we wouldn't even have pain killers for dental root infections if animal testing had never been conducted. It would be great if all that research could now simply be computer simulated, but as far as I know, it cannot. But there may also be a lot of unnecessary tests - where we simply don't need the products, or their further refinement.

Animals are God's creations like us and must be taken care of.However,newly developd products such as medicines should be testd and proven effective b4 it is used 4 public consumption and welfare,as well.Hence,we cant keep away with testing or experimentng on animals unless we will not test the products at all.

no. .

to gain smething u hv to loose. . . it d rule of nature. . . if researchers don't use animals to test the products then what else will they use? Human beings? quote agree

If the animal is used to test cosmetics then id say yes its a sin. If its for medicine mankind need, ill say its ok. or would you volunteer to be used as a guine-pig?

Yea reasechers need 2 use animals 4 testing cos dey cn test on humans

I av a cosmetic product which i want 2 test nd i nid a person 2 volunter his or her self nd know dat no 1 will dare volunter his self nd why not animal? --

what a pity f0r animals to be used as experementati0ns just f0r c0smetics reas0ns. why n0t l0ok f0r any alternatives. of c0urse human is n0t the answer.

Yes and i hate 2 b using dem --

may be it should coz. . .

Yes,they are needed

It shoud b done wit great care